We use cookies and similar technologies to help our website function and improve your experience. You can accept all cookies or manage your preferences.
Privacy PolicyPRACTICE AREAS
U.S. persons living or investing abroad — key planning and compliance considerations
The United States taxes its citizens and green card holders on worldwide income regardless of where they live or where the income is earned. A U.S. person who moves abroad, invests in a foreign company, holds a foreign portfolio, or maintains foreign financial accounts does not escape the U.S. tax system — they navigate two tax systems simultaneously. Without proactive planning, the result is double taxation, inefficient tax and corporate structures, unnecessarily complex accounting and tax reporting obligations, and penalty exposure, that worked in a purely domestic context but creates unexpected problems across borders.
This checklist covers the key outbound tax planning and compliance considerations for U.S. persons living abroad and U.S.-based investors with foreign holdings. It is not exhaustive — the analysis depends heavily on individual facts — but it identifies the issues that arise most frequently and carry the greatest consequences if left unaddressed.
Who should use this?
This checklist is for U.S. citizens and green card holders who live abroad or invest internationally from the United States — and for the attorneys, accountants, and advisors who work with them. It covers both the U.S. person who has relocated to a foreign country and the U.S.-based investor with foreign business interests, portfolios, or trusts.
Section 1
U.S. citizens and green card holders must file U.S. tax returns and report worldwide income regardless of where they live. These obligations do not end upon departure from the United States.
Failure to file carries significant penalties. The obligation continues until citizenship is formally renounced or the green card is relinquished — both of which have their own tax consequences.
Some states — including California and New York — aggressively assert continuing tax jurisdiction over former residents. A formal domicile change analysis may be required.
The FEIE and the foreign tax credit interact in complex ways. Electing the FEIE on earned income may reduce available foreign tax credits. The optimal strategy depends on your income type, foreign tax rates, and future plans.
Section 2
The foreign tax credit (FTC) is the primary mechanism for avoiding double taxation on foreign-source income. It requires active planning to be fully effective — it does not apply automatically in the most advantageous way.
Electing the credit rather than the deduction is almost always more favorable. The election must be made annually.
Section 3
U.S. persons who own interests in foreign companies face reporting obligations and potential immediate U.S. taxation on undistributed income — even if the company never pays a dividend. The analysis begins with how the foreign entity is classified for U.S. tax purposes.
The U.S. tax classification of a foreign entity is not always obvious and does not follow local law characterization. Under the check-the-box regulations, some foreign entities are ‘per se’ corporations, while others may elect their classification. The applicable regulations must be reviewed carefully.
NCTI imposes a minimum tax on a CFC’s net tested income. Planning — including the use of high-tax elections and careful structuring of the CFC’s income — can reduce exposure.
Penalties for failure to file these forms begin at $10,000 per form per year. Reasonable cause exceptions exist but require documentation.
Section 4
Foreign mutual funds, ETFs, and most non-U.S. pooled investment vehicles are passive foreign investment companies (PFICs). The default PFIC regime is punitive — imposing tax and interest charges on distributions and dispositions as if income had accrued ratably over the holding period. Timely elections can significantly reduce the burden.
| Step | Action | What to know |
|---|---|---|
| Identify | Identify all foreign mutual funds, ETFs, unit trusts, and other pooled investment vehicles in your portfolio — these are almost always PFICs. | Most non-U.S. pooled investment products fall under the PFIC regime by default. |
| QEF election | Determine whether a QEF (Qualified Electing Fund) election is available and whether the fund provides the required annual information statement. | A QEF election taxes PFIC income currently at ordinary rates, avoiding the punitive default regime. It requires the PFIC to provide an annual statement — many foreign funds do not, making the election unavailable. |
| MTM election | Evaluate whether a mark-to-market (MTM) election is preferable — treating annual appreciation as ordinary income rather than applying the default excess distribution rules. | Available only for PFIC stock that is regularly traded on a qualified exchange. |
| Default regime | For PFICs held without a timely election, analyze the default excess distribution rules and model the tax and interest charge on any planned distributions or dispositions. | Under the default rules, gain and excess distributions are spread over the holding period and taxed at the highest rate for each year, plus interest. |
| Dispose | Consider disposing of PFIC holdings and reinvesting in non-PFIC alternatives — U.S.-domiciled ETFs or direct stock holdings — to eliminate ongoing PFIC exposure. | A disposition triggers the PFIC charge once, but ends the annual compliance burden going forward. |
| Report | Confirm Form 8621 filing obligations — one form is required per PFIC per year. Even PFICs held with no distributions or dispositions may require annual reporting. | Missing Form 8621 can keep the statute of limitations open on the entire return. |
| Insurance & pensions | Assess whether any foreign life insurance, foreign annuity, or foreign pension product may be classified as a PFIC or have other adverse U.S. tax treatment. | Many foreign wrappers that are tax-favoured locally are not recognised as such under U.S. rules. |
Section 5
U.S. business owners who relocate abroad while continuing to manage a U.S. business face permanent establishment risk — the risk that the foreign country will assert the right to tax U.S. business profits because management and control is exercised from within its borders.
PE risk arises when a U.S. business owner habitually concludes contracts, makes key business decisions, or maintains a fixed place of business in the foreign country. Even working from home can create PE exposure in some jurisdictions.
Section 6
U.S. persons with connections to foreign trusts — as grantor, beneficiary, or trustee — face complex U.S. reporting obligations and potential income tax on trust distributions. Planning before distributions are made can significantly reduce exposure.
Foreign grantor trust status is generally more favorable for U.S. grantors — income is taxed to the grantor currently, and distributions to U.S. beneficiaries are tax-free. Foreign non-grantor trust distributions to U.S. beneficiaries may be subject to the throwback rules and interest charges.
Penalties for failure to file Forms 3520 and 3520-A begin at $10,000 per violation and can reach 35% of the gross value of trust assets or distributions.
Section 7
U.S. persons with foreign financial accounts must file FBAR and FATCA reports annually. These obligations apply to U.S.-based investors with foreign accounts as well as U.S. persons living abroad — the reporting requirement is not limited to those who have relocated.
The FBAR is filed separately from your tax return — directly with FinCEN by April 15, with an automatic extension to October 15. Willful failure to file carries penalties of up to the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the account balance per violation.
FBAR and Form 8938 overlap but are not identical. Both may apply simultaneously. FBAR covers financial accounts; Form 8938 covers a broader range of specified foreign financial assets including foreign partnership interests and certain foreign trusts.
Section 8
U.S. tax treaties can provide meaningful relief for U.S. persons abroad — but they do not eliminate U.S. worldwide taxation for citizens, and their benefits must be actively claimed. Understanding what a treaty does and does not provide is essential to outbound planning.
Treaty tie-breaker rules — which determine residence for treaty purposes when a person is resident in both countries — are generally not available to U.S. citizens to escape U.S. worldwide taxation due to the Savings Clause. Non-citizen U.S. residents (including green card holders) may have more flexibility.
Section 9
Outbound tax planning requires coordination across U.S. and foreign advisors. The failure to coordinate — particularly between U.S. tax counsel, foreign tax advisors, and financial advisors — is one of the most common sources of missed planning opportunities and inadvertent non-compliance.